Public v. Private School – Tough Choices

July 23, 2009

by guest blogger Thuli Katerere

In Forest Grove School District v. T.A, the Supreme Court ruled that in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (IDEA), parents of children with disabilities are entitled to reimbursement for the cost of private school if their public school cannot offer an adequate Individualized Education Plan, (IEP).  The IDEA guarantees free, appropriate public education for all children with disabilities.

Considering I am not a parent, nor have I ever been the main care-giver for a child with special needs, my opinions and insights are of course, only mere speculation.  It is impossible for me to know exactly the difficulties families face in acquiring the best care and education for their children and their struggles as advocates in a world of inequality. It would seem, though, that the best solution would be for public schools to make a concerted effort to have the adequate facilities, programs, and personnel to educate children with special needs. The parents involved in suits like this have attempted to send their children to public schools, but have found them lacking. Does it make more sense to invest funds before legally dictated reimbursements become necessary?

The process of approval for a reimbursement is hardly easy.  The law stipulates that many conditions be met before a family is eligible, including filing a request before enrollment into the private school.  And requests for reimbursement are not always approved; making the legal route of acquiring the best education for a child a monumental struggle.  Like these families need more work! 

Some parents believe that their children would face difficulties in a public school environment, and so a private or school for special needs becomes their first option.  But the parents who feel inclusion is better for their child deserve to have access to a quality education without taking legal measures.  Although several children will surely benefit from the Supreme Court’s ruling, the larger issue remains.  Because of the flawed nature of our current system these children have to battle even for their education.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

 

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Categories

Blogroll

Recent Posts

Tags

AblePlay YouTube Add new tag art products for children with special needs art therapy ban on lead benefits of art bullying and self-esteem Bush bans lead children overweight children with disabilities health Children with Special Needs and Parties Daniel Goleman emotional I.Q emotional intelligence friendship children with disabilities handicapped access handicapped public transportation health impllications overweight health obesity inspiring Mom kids lead bans lead children toys Lekotek Michael Savage mobility people with disabilities National Bullying Prevention Awareness Week new lead legislation No. 1 health concern obesity and health obesity health concern obesity in children overweight children Play therapy Power of Play President Bush lead right side of the brain Savage Nation social skills special needs Talk Radio Host Autism toughest lead standards in world toys understanding bullying World Wide Day of Play